Comments on: The Joys of Polarity Mapping https://uxmastery.com/the-joys-of-polarity-mapping/ The online learning community for human-centred designers Mon, 16 Aug 2021 23:36:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 By: Chris Corrigan https://uxmastery.com/the-joys-of-polarity-mapping/#comment-550328 Mon, 16 Aug 2021 23:36:31 +0000 https://uxmastery.com/?p=70583#comment-550328 In reply to Kristin Kniss.

No, because these aren’t polarities. A polarity is a relationship between two interdependant pairs. So, cost ——- quality is one.

]]> By: Braden Kelley https://uxmastery.com/the-joys-of-polarity-mapping/#comment-493332 Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:57:30 +0000 https://uxmastery.com/?p=70583#comment-493332 Sometimes the simplest things are the best!

]]> By: dave sainsbury https://uxmastery.com/the-joys-of-polarity-mapping/#comment-462006 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:33:47 +0000 https://uxmastery.com/?p=70583#comment-462006 I have wondered about the descriptor for the upper side of the poles. ‘Benefits of a focus on this pole’, ‘Results of a focus on this pole’, ‘Values=Positive results of a focus on this pole’.
These don’t seem to capture the motivating aspect.
Maybe ‘Values driving a focus on this pole’?

]]> By: Kristin Kniss https://uxmastery.com/the-joys-of-polarity-mapping/#comment-361929 Fri, 04 Jan 2019 23:08:08 +0000 https://uxmastery.com/?p=70583#comment-361929 I’m wondering if this mapping technique is still effective if you use more than two topics? For example, if you mapped cost, time, or quality would the mapping tool still work? It seems as though you may lose touch with which topic is impacting the others.

]]>